Growing up in the desert taught me to look for beauty and wisdom in not-so-obvious people and places. These are my reflections as I try to live into that lesson in my family, in my church, in my politics and in the world.
Monday, July 13, 2015
A racist Atticus Finch is us, white people. All of us.
Like most people, I love To Kill a Mockingbird. I loved Gregory Peck as Atticus. I loved Scout and Jem and Dill and Calpurnia and Boo Radley. I've lost count of how many times I've read it, or watched the movie.
And I plan to read Go Set a Watchman. But like way too many others, I will not be devastated to read that Atticus turns out to be a racist in his old age. Why?
Because Atticus was a racist in To Kill a Mockingbird.
Yes. He was. So was Scout. And Jem. And Dill.
And so was every other white person in this nation then -- yes, even in the smug Northeast, from which many of these shocked and outraged book reviews are coming.
They couldn't help it. They were as immersed in the racism of this nation as fish are in water. And like fish that don't notice water until they are ripped from it, they didn't notice racism except when it threatened them -- or someone they cared about.
The characters in Mockingbird were immersed in what was perhaps a more blatant racism, but it differed only in degree from that of the rest of the nation. And this is still going on today.
Because being a racist is not just being a violent bigot who wants to lynch black men who dare to look at -- or worse, pity -- white women. Being a racist is taking part in and benefiting from-- either passively or actively -- the systemic oppression of an entire people simply because of their skin color. It's not just waving a Confederate flag, or using the N-word. Racism is being able to not even notice white privilege. It's assuming white children have an innocence that black children do not. It's according a dignity to white people of any age that is too often denied to black people of any age.
Ever wonder why Atticus' maid, Calpurnia, comes in the back door of the house instead of the front door? Because she's a Negro. Note that in the cast of characters, she and another black woman, Lula, are the only people without last names. And even little girl Scout and saintly Atticus call the adult maid by her first name while their white neighbor is called Miss Maudie. And while Miss Maudie is pretty open-minded, even she gives thanks for not being born a black person:
"The handful of people in this town who say that fair play is not marked White Only; the handful of people who say a fair trial is for everybody, not just us; the handful of people with enough humility to think, when they look at a Negro, there but for the Lord's kindness am I."
When Calpurnia takes Scout and Jem with her to her church, Scout asks, "Cal, why do you talk nigger-talk to the—to your folks when you know it's not right?"
Atticus is assigned to defend Tom Robinson, he doesn't volunteer to do it. But once assigned, it's more his ingrained sense of justice -- and his own self-image -- that causes him to put on a real defense as much as any outrage at the racism inherent in the case.
Remember the famous courtroom scene, when Scout sneaks into the balcony? All the black people are forced to sit up there, yet a little white girl and boy are allowed to be there too, while any little black girl or boy who tried to sit downstairs would have been thrown out. And while Scout calls Calpurnia, an adult Negro woman, by her first name, Scout, a white child, is called Miss Jean Louise even by the Reverend Sykes, the respected Negro pastor.
None of this strikes Scout or Jem-- or her father -- as strange.
Tom Robinson is called Tom, not Mr. Robinson, by Atticus. But he calls Atticus "Mr. Finch." Neither finds this strange. And even Atticus knew the best he could do for Robinson was to give him the strongest defense possible in the face of a preordained guilty verdict. Even though Robinson clearly could not have done what he was accused of, it didn't matter. Race trumped justice. Bob Ewell and his daughter may be trash, but they are WHITE trash, and that makes all the difference.
But when white trash Bob Ewell attacks Scout and Jem, and is knifed to death by the reclusive Boo Radley, a white man, Atticus, along with everyone else accepts it when the sheriff announces that Ewell fell on his own knife -- even though everyone (including the sheriff) knows Boo Radley did it. Here class trumps justice. An upper class, if reclusive, white man kills a trashy poor white man. No big deal.
It was all part of the racism and classism of the South and of all the United States, then, and now.
So get over your shock about Atticus, white people. He is us. All of us.
Sunday, June 14, 2015
Texas Democrats - the party for sane Texans
Not too long ago the Republican governor of Texas added his gubernatorial credibility to the paranoid fantasies of extremists that the federal government was going to invade Texas under the guise of a military exercise. He seriously ordered the Texas State Guard to keep on eye on the U. S. Armed Forces to "protect Texans' rights and property," which brought up this mental image:
This was just about the last straw in a huge bale of crazy for me. I created a new Facebook avatar and a bumper sticker:
I just wanted to remind the world that there ARE some sane Texans. I think there are LOT of sane Texans. In fact, I think there are more sane Texans than there are insane Texans. A lot of those sane Texans are Democrats, but believe it or not, there are sane Republicans as well. And certainly Independents. And all Libertarians think they are sane, right?
So when I was invited to speak to the Northeast Tarrant County Democrats on Flag Day, June 14, I decided to share my idea with them:
So when I was invited to speak to the Northeast Tarrant County Democrats on Flag Day, June 14, I decided to share my idea with them:
Let’s reboot the Texas Democratic Party
as the party of sane Texans.
And here are my admittedly rough draft thoughts of what the Sane Democratic Party will
do:
- We will advocate for automatic voter registration upon a Texan's 18th birthday.
- We will work to make voting as convenient as texting – although we won’t let you do it while you are driving.
- We will support the police by holding rogue officers accountable, because one bad officer can undermine public confidence in police much faster than 50 good officers can build it up.
- We will work to eliminate the school-to-prison pipeline by working with school districts to keep police out of school disciplinary matters.
- We will opt out as much as possible of the incredibly wasteful expensive and useless War on Drugs, and instead put resources into education and regulation, much as we do with alcohol now.
- We will acknowledge that most Texans are people of faith. We won’t patronize or condescend to them. We will honor the First Amendment by keeping the state out of religion and religion out of legislative matters.
- We will proclaim that freedom of religion means the freedom to practice your faith and live out your beliefs. It does not mean the right to impose your religious beliefs on everyone else through the force of law.
- We will respect rural Texans, listen to them, and engage them in policy decisions while at the same time working with urban areas to meet their needs.
- We will acknowledge most Texans grew up around guns. We will talk sensibly about this but we won’t pander. The Second Amendment should be respected, not fetishized. Guns should be regulated as least as much as cars are – people have to pass a test to be licensed. Guns, like cars, aren’t appropriate in all places. More guns make us less safe, not more.
Monday, December 08, 2014
Let's Play Godball!
If you've read this blog for any length of time at all, you will remember sermons by my friend Bruce Coggin. I've hosted several of his sermons here.
The great good news is that he's now published a book of sermons preached from 2009 to 2014. They were preached as he
served several congregations who were displaced from their buildings after the
split in our diocese, as well as at a couple of other parishes. They are funny, moving,
thoughtful, surprising, and down to earth in the way only a guy with a genius
IQ from Bowie, Montague County, Texas, can commit.
These sermons fed the souls of people who were displaced, hurting, and feeling pretty alone. They helped these folks heal, they empowered them, and they sent them out to offer that healing love to the parts of the world in which they found themselves.
But here's the thing. You don't have to like sermons to love this book. You just have to like great writing and story telling. These are the work of a GREAT story-teller.
Let's Play Godball! Unorthodox Sermons by a Circuit Rider Episcopal Priest from Middle Texas is available at Amazon.
The Foreword is by the Rt. Rev. Sam B. Hulsey, retired bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Northwest Texas.
Owanah Anderson,
long time senior warden at All Saints’, Wichita Falls, writes in a cover blurb,
“Hearing Bruce Coggin preach is an energizing, enlightening experience. His
loving use of language – sometimes homespun, sometimes scholarly erudite –
awakens one with a jolt: ‘Hey, I knew that! How come I’d not already tooled
those words into my own thinking?’ And you carry home the concept and count it
as your own treasure.”
Friday, November 07, 2014
Rebooting the Democratic Party in Texas
The Texas
Democratic Party needs to reboot. Here is a start at some things I suggest they
think about:
Democrats, PLEASE
don't act like God doesn't exist. A LOT of people in Texas are people of faith,
whether you like it or not. Our faith informs our politics, so don't discount
that, and for God's sake, don't patronize or condescend to us.
Texans who live
in rural areas aren't idiots. They are conservative the way people who make
their livings from the land are conservative. They are pragmatic conservatives,
and for the most part, they aren't mean spirited. They are usually whip smart
and endlessly inventive -- how do you think they'd manage to wrest out a living
in rural Texas otherwise? Respect them and their way of life and they will
listen to you.
Keep it positive
and keep it real. Don't make promises you can't keep. Acknowledge that most
Texans grew up around guns and that MOST of them, like me and others, learned
sensible rules about how to act around guns. I personally am not a gun owner,
but people I love and respect are. Talk sensibly about this -- don't pander.
Talk about what
this state needs. An educated work force is an economic issue. Companies moving
here need skilled workers. If our school systems can't provide that, they will
move elsewhere.
A healthy work
force is an economic issue. Sick people can't work. Access to health care for
everyone is an economic driver. Invest in it.
Women being able
to control their reproductive lives is an economic issue. There aren't enough
men to fill all the jobs so, yes, women will be needed. Safe contraception also
helps prevent unwanted pregnancies and thus reduces abortions.
Job safety is an
economic issue. Having workers die on the job is not only immoral, but it costs
money to retrain a replacement. Talk about these things in ways that the most
conservative business person can "get," in ways that relate to their
lives.
If our roads and
infrastructure are falling apart, goods and services can't be safely delivered.
INVESTMENT in these things is an economic driver, not a tax burden.
Poverty, not
race, not political party, not even quality of schools, is the greatest driver
of the most common problems in our state. It's related to failure to thrive, to
failure in school, to the likelihood of ending up in prison. Poor people are
NOT the enemy. Pragmatic compassion means investing in ALL Texans, not just
those above the poverty line.
Rich people are
not the enemy. Treat them with the same respect you do others -- the same
respect. Don't pander to them, and don't dismiss them.
Young people are
not "the future." Young people are HERE RIGHT NOW. Listen to them.
They are drawn to the relevant and the authentic. Don't just go for their
energy. Seek out their ideas, their dreams. And here's a thought -- Respect
them.
Technology is not
the answer to everything. It's a tool that makes life hugely more convenient
but it is RELATIONSHIPS that matter in politics, particularly in Texas
politics. There aren't six degrees of separation in Texas, as huge as this
state is. For many of us, if you diss some of us, you diss us all.
Pay your civic
rent. Work at the local level. Get involved in your city halls and your school
boards, Then work your way up. But for Pete's sake, get people to run for
office at all levels. We can't vote for Democrats if no Democrats are running.
OK. What else?
From comments on Facebook:
From Cindy Wood:
If there is no water, there should be no big companies moving here with
lots of employees and more housing needs. Job creation is one thing. However,
the drought is so destructive to those in the rural areas you talk about, as
well as parks and recreation, that all of Texas loses anytime another 100,
1000, 10,000, 100,000 people start drinking and bathing and watering their
grass. There is no water for growth.
From Terry Evans:
Find a way to separate issues of fairness and economic good sense from
emotional and philosophical prejudice in people's minds. For instance, if we
could get regular folks to look at gay marriage and marijuana legalization (at
least medical) without filtering the issues through culture-tinted glasses,
maybe they would see there's no valid reason to oppose them, and many good
reasons to allow them.
From Diane
Morrison Snow: We need to let people know about how many Texans now have
health insurance that are very proud to have it . And we need to expand
Medicaid and get that money that other states are getting because we turned it
down. We got Ann Richards in .. We can get another Democratic governor
in!
From Thomas
Baker: News flash: Some Dems are persons of faith or religion who simply
believe in separation of church and state. They sometimes get brief from both
sides: their faithful church friends and their faithful political friends.
Abortion is a real dividing line nowadays with Catholics. If you are a Dem your
Catholic friends and the church probably see you somehow as heretic if not
demonic because you support candidates from the perceived abortion party. I
personally abhor abortion. I see the side that government has power to make
some laws and I see that women have rights to make medical decisions regarding
their bodies with their doctors. To me abortion was the unspoken elephant in
the room in this gubernatorial election.
Saturday, September 06, 2014
Looking at TREC's proposal from the other side of schism
You know, I really did want to support TREC.
After all, I live in a diocese that has been flying the airplane while we are building it in the wake of a 2008 schism when our former bishop and much of the diocesan leadership left The Episcopal Church but claimed –and occupied – most of our church property. We have been Reimagining the Church like crazy around here ever since then. So I was eagerly awaiting TREC’s ideas.
Others – Episcopal CafĂ© here and here, Tom Ferguson on his blog Crusty Old Dean here, commentors on the HOB/D list -- have done brilliant jobs of outlining things they like and things that concern them, and I urge you to read them all. I haven’t written a detailed analysis. Instead, I offer a view from the other side of schism, for what it’s worth.
My first reaction was - what business major wrote this and has he or she ever been to church?
My second reaction was - has this person ever been to a General Convention?
My third reaction was - did they really think through the implications of using Lazarus as a starting place?
Seriously?
Lazarus?
And my fourth reaction was – did no one learn ANYTHING from what happened in San Joaquin, Quincy, Fort Worth, Pittsburgh, and, most recently, South Carolina?
Full disclosure – I live in the Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth. I am a lay woman coming at this from the perspective of a person who was confined to the margins of my diocese, and thus of General Convention, for more than 20 years. As an outsider I observed the workings of the church in ways that insiders don’t have to. For me, as for people of color, all women, for my LGBT sisters and brothers, learning the ways of those who held power was not a luxury – it was imperative if there was to be any chance of being heard in the councils of the church.
Tipping the scales of the balance of power in favor of those traditionally on the margins was not then and is not now easy in an institution still steeped in clericalism and mesmerized by the color purple. But it is possible, with patience and a willingness to understand how the system works, to learn where the ways into the system are, and where the system offers opportunities for anyone to speak up. All of this is true, by the way, of ANY institutional system, no matter how big or small.
In 2009, I suddenly was thrust into “insider” status. My bishop left The Episcopal Church, we reorganized the diocese, I was elected a deputy and, to my utter amazement, elected to Executive Council on the first ballot at General Convention in Anaheim. My work on the margins had given me enough name recognition to make that possible.
At home my diocese and other reorganized dioceses still are working to rebuild in the wake of a schism that should have been prevented. I see amazing creativity and openness to new ways of being church. I see clergy learning to value the lay people with whom they partner. I see lay people growing into the fullness of their baptisms. I watch feisty small congregations take on ministry projects that would make many large congregations cower. I see displaced congregations growing into being Welcoming Congregations. I watch valiant Episcopalians in congregations that have been locked out of their church homes faithfully creating church from scratch every single Sunday in rented spaces they have access to only on Sunday. I see growth, small, but steady.
Why? Because even though people are tired, they are not afraid. We are not into feeding the fears here.
Of course, I also see families split between those who stayed with The Episcopal Church and those who stayed with Bishop Iker. I see time and way too much money being eaten up in legal fights that Could. Have. Been. Avoided.
The schism in my diocese – as in San Joaquin, Quincy, Pittsburgh, and now South Carolina -- was more than 20 years in the making. The people organizing this move were almost to a man ordained (very few women were involved). They made no secret of their goals - read the Chapman memo and Jim Naughton’s Following the Money. Laity were disempowered. Those who protested were demonized and marginalized, and those who were compliant were used as tools to further the aims of the clergy. Purple reigned, with bishops taking the idea of “princes of the church” into new realms of virtually unchecked power.
The twenty years leading up to the schisms were filled with strife fulminated by these people intent on undermining The Episcopal Church. They wanted a very public fight in which they would be seen standing up for patriarchy, “traditional marriage,” and a vision of The Episcopal Church as it was in the 1950s, when men were men and women – and minorities – knew their place. This had the effect of running off folks who don’t like conflict, folks who don’t like bigots, and folks who bought into the idea that politics is a dirty word. All these added to the ongoing decline in all the mainstream protestant denominations, which led to calls for a more “nimble” church.
During this time, two presiding bishops and the House of Bishops worked hard to placate their brother bishops and fellow priests and their conservative allies in the Anglican Communion. This purple brotherhood did virtually nothing to stop the bishops who later would leave The Episcopal Church while laying claim to millions of dollars’ worth of Episcopal Church property. If you have wondered why the larger church should help pay the legal expenses of San Joaquin and South Carolina, it’s because the wider church’s inaction allowed this legal mess to happen.
What happened in my diocese and the others happened not because General Convention is too big and too long, not because the PB doesn’t have enough power, not because there are too many CCABs, not because the Executive Council has too many people -- but because the balance between clergy and laity was tilted mightily in the direction of the clergy, silencing and marginalizing lay people. There were no countervailing voices strong enough to gainsay what the bishops were doing. There was no will among the House of Bishops to use even peer pressure, much less what canonical powers did exist, to rein these men in.
And now comes TREC with a proposal to turn us into a Roman Catholic Church Light with our own PB pope, a much smaller role for laity in a smaller General Convention and Executive Council, and – has anyone noticed? No change at all in the frequent meetings and workings of the House of Bishops. Additionally, in a church full of small congregations, this proposal will insure that no one from a small congregation can be elected to anything, Episcopalians living west of the Mississippi will be invisible and church wide staff for the most part will be independent contractors, which absolves employers of any emotional investment as well as most of the financial investment made in regular employees.
And all this is supposed to make us nimble – because look how nimble the Vatican is.
After all, I live in a diocese that has been flying the airplane while we are building it in the wake of a 2008 schism when our former bishop and much of the diocesan leadership left The Episcopal Church but claimed –and occupied – most of our church property. We have been Reimagining the Church like crazy around here ever since then. So I was eagerly awaiting TREC’s ideas.
Others – Episcopal CafĂ© here and here, Tom Ferguson on his blog Crusty Old Dean here, commentors on the HOB/D list -- have done brilliant jobs of outlining things they like and things that concern them, and I urge you to read them all. I haven’t written a detailed analysis. Instead, I offer a view from the other side of schism, for what it’s worth.
My first reaction was - what business major wrote this and has he or she ever been to church?
My second reaction was - has this person ever been to a General Convention?
My third reaction was - did they really think through the implications of using Lazarus as a starting place?
Seriously?
Lazarus?
And my fourth reaction was – did no one learn ANYTHING from what happened in San Joaquin, Quincy, Fort Worth, Pittsburgh, and, most recently, South Carolina?
Full disclosure – I live in the Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth. I am a lay woman coming at this from the perspective of a person who was confined to the margins of my diocese, and thus of General Convention, for more than 20 years. As an outsider I observed the workings of the church in ways that insiders don’t have to. For me, as for people of color, all women, for my LGBT sisters and brothers, learning the ways of those who held power was not a luxury – it was imperative if there was to be any chance of being heard in the councils of the church.
Tipping the scales of the balance of power in favor of those traditionally on the margins was not then and is not now easy in an institution still steeped in clericalism and mesmerized by the color purple. But it is possible, with patience and a willingness to understand how the system works, to learn where the ways into the system are, and where the system offers opportunities for anyone to speak up. All of this is true, by the way, of ANY institutional system, no matter how big or small.
In 2009, I suddenly was thrust into “insider” status. My bishop left The Episcopal Church, we reorganized the diocese, I was elected a deputy and, to my utter amazement, elected to Executive Council on the first ballot at General Convention in Anaheim. My work on the margins had given me enough name recognition to make that possible.
At home my diocese and other reorganized dioceses still are working to rebuild in the wake of a schism that should have been prevented. I see amazing creativity and openness to new ways of being church. I see clergy learning to value the lay people with whom they partner. I see lay people growing into the fullness of their baptisms. I watch feisty small congregations take on ministry projects that would make many large congregations cower. I see displaced congregations growing into being Welcoming Congregations. I watch valiant Episcopalians in congregations that have been locked out of their church homes faithfully creating church from scratch every single Sunday in rented spaces they have access to only on Sunday. I see growth, small, but steady.
Why? Because even though people are tired, they are not afraid. We are not into feeding the fears here.
Of course, I also see families split between those who stayed with The Episcopal Church and those who stayed with Bishop Iker. I see time and way too much money being eaten up in legal fights that Could. Have. Been. Avoided.
The schism in my diocese – as in San Joaquin, Quincy, Pittsburgh, and now South Carolina -- was more than 20 years in the making. The people organizing this move were almost to a man ordained (very few women were involved). They made no secret of their goals - read the Chapman memo and Jim Naughton’s Following the Money. Laity were disempowered. Those who protested were demonized and marginalized, and those who were compliant were used as tools to further the aims of the clergy. Purple reigned, with bishops taking the idea of “princes of the church” into new realms of virtually unchecked power.
The twenty years leading up to the schisms were filled with strife fulminated by these people intent on undermining The Episcopal Church. They wanted a very public fight in which they would be seen standing up for patriarchy, “traditional marriage,” and a vision of The Episcopal Church as it was in the 1950s, when men were men and women – and minorities – knew their place. This had the effect of running off folks who don’t like conflict, folks who don’t like bigots, and folks who bought into the idea that politics is a dirty word. All these added to the ongoing decline in all the mainstream protestant denominations, which led to calls for a more “nimble” church.
During this time, two presiding bishops and the House of Bishops worked hard to placate their brother bishops and fellow priests and their conservative allies in the Anglican Communion. This purple brotherhood did virtually nothing to stop the bishops who later would leave The Episcopal Church while laying claim to millions of dollars’ worth of Episcopal Church property. If you have wondered why the larger church should help pay the legal expenses of San Joaquin and South Carolina, it’s because the wider church’s inaction allowed this legal mess to happen.
What happened in my diocese and the others happened not because General Convention is too big and too long, not because the PB doesn’t have enough power, not because there are too many CCABs, not because the Executive Council has too many people -- but because the balance between clergy and laity was tilted mightily in the direction of the clergy, silencing and marginalizing lay people. There were no countervailing voices strong enough to gainsay what the bishops were doing. There was no will among the House of Bishops to use even peer pressure, much less what canonical powers did exist, to rein these men in.
And now comes TREC with a proposal to turn us into a Roman Catholic Church Light with our own PB pope, a much smaller role for laity in a smaller General Convention and Executive Council, and – has anyone noticed? No change at all in the frequent meetings and workings of the House of Bishops. Additionally, in a church full of small congregations, this proposal will insure that no one from a small congregation can be elected to anything, Episcopalians living west of the Mississippi will be invisible and church wide staff for the most part will be independent contractors, which absolves employers of any emotional investment as well as most of the financial investment made in regular employees.
And all this is supposed to make us nimble – because look how nimble the Vatican is.
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Why I am an Episcopalian - the elevator speech
I am an Episcopalian because The Episcopal Church is not afraid
to explore what Baptism really means. When one is sealed as Christ’s Own
Forever, there are no asterisks. Women, men, gay, straight, trans, black,
white, Asian, Native American, Hispanic, mixed race – all are acknowledged as
part of the Body. Figuring out what this means in the context of scripture is
hard work. At its best, The Episcopal Church calls on everyone – bishops,
priests, deacons, lay people -- to work in partnership to figure it out. We don’t always get the balance right, but
what I love is that we keep trying, struggling to love one another even when we may not like one another.
Sunday, December 08, 2013
A Funeral Homily
NOTE: I am pleased to host this homily for my friend Bruce Coggin.
-----------------------------
A Funeral Homily for Paul CrewsThe Rev. Bruce Coggin
preached at St. Mary’s Church, Hillsboro, Texas
November 11, 2013
“I am the resurrection and the life, saith the Lord. He that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live; and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die.”
Lord, what a mouthful! What a statement, what a really big statement. Jesus bit off a mouthful when he said that.
In nearly half a century of priesthood, I don’t know how many times I’ve said those words as I headed down some church aisle on occasions like this one, dozens, surely a hundred and more. And every time I’ve done it, I’ve started with a little word to myself: “Son, whether you believe all this or not, you’d better sound like you do.” Because I can hardly imagine making a larger claim. Just think. Life. Life! If you believe in God, you know it’s his greatest gift to us, calling us out of nothing into something, into being, into sharing God’s own life. Even people who don’t believe in the God we worship or any god at all, I think they’re mighty happy to be alive too. Few mean it when they say, “Oh, I wish I’d never been born”; and when life is so bad some people end it themselves, I think they do it from a sense of real disappointment in how wonderful it could have been. Because life is pretty wonderful, all things considered, and none of us really wants to leave it. I can’t prove that, but I expect it’s generally the truth. And I think it’s safe to say that, even if we tire of life, we don’t want to . . . well . . . die. When I learned my sweet Grandmother Yeager was sick unto death, we had a visit, and I asked her, “Mamaw, are you afraid?” And she said, “Well, Honey, I’m not afraid of being dead. I mean, it’ll either be wonderful or it’ll be nothing. But I just don’t look forward to doing it.” Death is the stark negation of everything we love and long for and cling to, and the experience itself . . . I’m not looking forward to it, tellya right now. Don’t imagine you are either. In the presence of the majesty of Death, a great hush falls on us all. Or should anyway.
Well, we’re here this morning because one of us has died—Paul—your husband and father and friend, our friend whom we treasured and enjoyed and respected and put up with, just because he was Paul—most of you call him Hotch—and found him dear if difficult at times and bound ourselves to him in love and affection and friendship. He died last week, as you know, at the end of a short, hard battle with the disease that finally took his life away. The little rubbery machine he lived in gave out, just like yours and mine will, and he shuffled off the mortal coil. But like the Prayer Book says, as the outer man decayed, so was the inner man the more strengthened, because he stayed Paul right up to the end. Those of you who were with him say he was happy. Think of that.
At this point, funeral homilies are supposed to dwell on the more presentable details of the life of the honored guest. Fact is, most of you here this morning knew Paul Crews better than I did. I met him—Barbara, when would it have been?—back in the days when I lived in Cleburne and was Dean of the old Southern Deanery, I guess. I visited here back then, mostly while St. Mary’s was giving birth to the congregation over on Lake Whitney. In the eighties. And then life intervened and we didn’t see each other again until maybe five years ago or so when I started coming to Hillsboro a couple times a month, though we might wave at each other at some church gathering. I’m not going to do that routine, because I wouldn’t have half so much to say as some of you. Instead I’ve been trying to think about what Paul’s death means to me, what my experience of him was and why I will be diminished by his passing. Put it that way, and I can tell you some things for sure. First, my experience of Paul was entirely positive. Oh, I don’t doubt he had a negative side; we all do; and you know enough about that. I, though, knew nothing but his big, sky-wide grin and his firm handshake and the unfailing offer, “Father, is there anything I can do?” Usually there was, and he did it, usually did it well. He read the Bible like he’d read it before. If we lunched after prayers, he was right in the middle of the conversation, had something to say, usually intelligent. I never heard him say anything ugly about anybody. I’m sure he did from time to time, but I never heard it. But I can’t claim that Paul was my intimate friend. Rather I’ve been trying to come up with some image to capture my experience of Paul, and I think I hit on one the other day. You know those little bitty teeny-tiny bright bright lights people sometimes use at Christmas? Sometimes you’ll come across a winter tree, no leaves, just swathed in them, and it’s often a pretty exhilarating sight. There was a famous old pecan tree in Highland Park in Dallas that some feller saved, and the city used to wrap it in those little twinkling lights. Well, if I think of the broad array of people I know and like and love as such a tree, then one of those little twinklers just winked off. My life won’t change radically as a result, but I miss it. I know it’s off.
And now, back to the beginning. Resurrection. “He that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live.” There’s that large claim again. In the face of the physical evidence—Paul’s ashes are right there, ashes to ashes, dust to dust, right there—we gather to proclaim our faith that at death our lives are not ended but rather changed. We who have known resurrection all our lives—in our baptism, in our sinning and repenting and living again, in the thousand ways your life or mine has at times become a living death and all the Hell we need, then turned and revived and lived again, stronger and more joyous than ever—we who have known resurrection all our lives, we now claim that for Paul. In the very next breath comes the question: just what does that mean? What does resurrection mean? What does it mean to you? I figure most of us grew up in religious communities where as children we learned about Heaven, all the golden streets and the angels and the harps and Mama and Papa and Cousin Martha coming to meet us, spending the rest of our days singing God’s praise. All that. Most of us also sorta kinda turned loose of that Norman Rockwell kind of Heaven on down the line, find it all charming and dear but not entirely . . . So then what is it? God knows I’ve pondered it considerably in the past seven decades, and I have a lot of trouble wrapping my mind around it. Oh, my heart goes there in a flash, but when I think about it, I have to be honest with myself. It’s pretty daunting. First thing I wonder is, will I know me after I die? I mean, will I survive personally, as me, as Bruce? It seems unreasonable that the God who took the trouble to make the splendor that is me, the splendor that was Paul, that is you, unreasonable to think that God our creator would go to so much work to make us and then . . . just throw us away or leave us with some vague concept of living on in the memories of those who loved us and so on. Nah, I want to live, I, me. And yet . . . ? When I contemplate those images from the Hubble telescope, the unmanageable chaos which is in fact a kind of order, the unsearchable depths and distances, the violent mystery of the Big Bang and the questions it raises—What banged? Who banged it?—why, I don’t know about you, but my composure just collapses around my feet and my courage turns to skim milk. How can I, l’il ol’ me, one of some billions living now and of uncounted hosts of those who have lived before and all those yet to come, just a little twinkler down in the corner of God’s sparkletree—what arrogant vanity leads me to believe I can actually continue to . . . be, to know, to love . . . in the midst of All That? Who do I think I am? Yet even from the depth of that quivering despair, I really wish I could, really hope I will, really do want to see Who Banged and What Banged and how it is that The One who did all that took frail flesh and died . . . for me. I think we all really want to do that, even in the face of worlds of evidence to the contrary.
Jesus says we can. Jesus says we will. He promised it. All the lessons we read at funerals are full of it. We sometimes hear Job affirm that he knows his redeemer lives and that he shall see him face to face and not as a stranger. We often hear Paul remind us that nothing—neither height nor depth nor principalities nor powers nor life nor death—absolutely nothing can separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus. Jesus himself tells that he will take to himself all who come to him, all the Father sends, and that he will lose not one of us. In the lesson from John’s gospel you just heard, he tells us that his Father’s house is a big one, plenty of room, and that he’s going on ahead to get our room ready—and then he asks, “Would I lie to you about something like that?” Know what? I don’t believe he would; and whereas it’s more than I can wrap my mind around, I have faith that the God who has shown us so much resurrection in this life will go right on being the same life-giving, life-restoring, loving, forgiving father or parent or creator or what word you like that I’ve known all my life. None of us knows when our turn to cross the bar will come. I just hope I’m there when it happens. I mean I hope I’m not drugged up and inconscient. I hope I can, like Paul, face it like a man. I am going to be scared, I know, but I hope I have the presence of mind to say, “Precious Lord, take my hand. Lead me to the promised land. O Lord Jesus, take me with you.” And after that, well, it’s all up to him.
So this day we come to mourn the loss of Paul, and we’ll shed some tears. I’m glad. I don’t understand dry-eyed funerals. I hope somebody sheds a tear for me. But in the midst of our sorrow, hope rises; in darkness, light shines; and even at the grave we make our song: Alleluia! Alleluia! Alleluia! Happy are they who die in the Lord, because they rest from their labors in that place where the saints cast down their golden crowns around the glassy sea.
And now may the God of peace who brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus Christ, the great shepherd of the sheep, by the blood of the everlasting covenant, make you perfect in every good work to do his will, working in you that which is well pleasing in his sight; and the blessing of God Almighty, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost be upon you and remain with you until time is no more.
Amen. Alleluia.
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
We never know what kiss will awaken a child
----------------------------------
They give wonderful
things, such as the gift of beauty, and song. I always loved that scene,
because
I thought it was the dream of all parents - to know what wonderful gifts
your child possessed. Even when the scene was interrupted by the wicked
Maleficent, I still felt that Aurora's parents had the better of it.
Maleficent, in a fit of rage, cursed the child so she would
prick her finger on the spindle of a spinning wheel and die. However, one of
the good little godmothers hadn't given Aurora her gift yet and so was able to
mitigate the curse. Aurora still would prick her finger, but she wouldn't die.
She would simply sleep until awakened by true love's kiss.
But as bad as that still was, at least Aurora’s parents had
some idea of what to expect.
What parents wouldn't like even a small clue as to what
gifts were embodied in their child and what the future holds for her or him?
Unlike Aurora's parents, we can only wait to see what gifts
will emerge in our children. We have to await patiently the unveiling of the marvelous
secrets they hold within.
Twenty years ago today, a nurse handed me a tiny bundle
whose eyes and fists were so tightly shut I was convinced they never would
open. No sooner had the door shut behind her, though, than those fists unclenched
and one tiny hand closed around my little finger. At the same time, those eyes
opened and I found myself looking into the bluest blue eyes I had seen up to then,
or since.
And I fell instantly, irrevocably, head-over-heels. sky-rockets-and-brass-bands,
earth-shakingly, totally, in love.
She and I looked at each other for a long time. I don't know
what she saw, but I saw the most magnificent blending of her father and me that
could be imagined. Somehow, the best of both of us had gone into her making and
out of two such different people had come this unique individual.
Some of the gifts became visible early on. Even as a small
child, she could draw well. She understood color and line and space early, and
it shows in her artwork, in her room and in her clothes.
She has a stubborn streak that is serving her better all the
time as she figures out how to manage it. She has an uncanny instinct about people,
and I've learned to pay attention to her first impressions. She loves animals,
music, family gatherings when her uncles start telling jokes, and fast cars.
She has a generous spirit, and no meanness exists in her
soul. She is gentle and can tell a joke well. She is loyal and will brook no
slight to those she loves. She is a good letter-writer and loves to read.
She already knows how to forgive and is learning patience.
I'm not saying Maleficent left her alone. She doesn't leave
anyone alone. She moves about, playing tricks on us all, dealing out a short
temper here, giving out selfishness there, and robbing most of us of the
ability to see our gifts.
This last is Maleficent’s favorite trick, I suspect. All
people, with the exception of a lucky few, have to fight through lack of belief
in themselves before they can become comfortable in the world. Some never make
it and go through life convinced they are impostors, undeserving of the success
they've achieved.
If I had three wishes to give our children, t would give
them the ability to believe in themselves, to see the gifts they already
possess and to be open to those gifts that haven’t fully revealed themselves to
them yet.
But when the babies arrive, there aren't any fairy
godmothers, and there aren't any instructions. We parents have to simply do the
best we can with what we have at the time.
So it happens that when parents think of their children, our
minds form that eternal parental question: How goes it with the child?
As I consider my child on the 20th anniversary of
her birth, I realize that there is never going to be an answer to that question
for me.
The only answer that matters has to come from her, for her.
The hard truth is, no parent can provide the kiss, the answer
that will awaken the child's sleeping self.
Parents can only provide an atmosphere in which the kiss can
happen that brings the child into full awareness of her or his or her capabilities.
But there are some gifts we can give them. One is keeping quiet so they will have a chance to
hear that answer when it comes.
And the other is to let them know they are loved, that they
do not sleep unguarded.
______________________
Happy birthday, my darling.
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Packing the house and heading for college
Here is another of the columns I wrote about my daughter when I worked for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. This was published September 12, 1985.
-----------------------
I spent this last
weekend protecting my possessions from invaders from the east.
My daughter was
home from college for the weekend. As she was preparing to leave, I discovered among
the things she was planning to take back to school:
- A 5-foot shelf that had been holding some of my books in the library.
- The extension cord I keep permanently on the vacuum cleaner so I can vacuum the entire house without changing outlets.
- My wonderful white cuddly terry cloth bathrobe.
- The brand new can of spray starch.
- A large carpet scrap that had been hanging in the garage against the day we needed it to patch the carpet in the house.
- A large red plastic storage container into which I had tossed packages of photographs I planned to organize someday before I'm 80.
- The lotion in the large bottle I keep by my bed. (The bottle was still there - the lotion had been poured into her bottle.)
As I discovered
these things, her invariable response was, “Well, you never use it
anyway."
Apparently, if it
was not on my body or in my hand at the particular moment she decided it would
look good in her dorm room or on her body, it was fair game.
As we began
negotiating over what was to be put back and what she could take, I realized
this child is missing her calling. She should be in our State Department,
heading up our negotiating teams. We would not only have the Soviet Union
totally disarmed within days, we might end up owning it - or at least a good portion
of it would be in her dorm room.
As I was telling
some friends about this raid on my household, I discovered mine is an
experience common to most parents of college-age children who live away from home.
One woman told
how it happened to her. Seems the father of a friend of her son had pulled a
horse trailer equipped with hanging rods into their driveway. Her son proceeded
to empty the entire contents of his closet into the trailer. (Two chairs also
disappeared from his room.)
When his mother
asked why he was taking everything to school instead of splitting it into warm
weather clothes and cold weather clothes, he patiently explained that taking it
all was easier than deciding.
I told some other
friends of this phenomenon, whereupon one told of how she knew her oldest son
had really left home for good. He borrowed a friend's van and began to load it
with things from her house.
His two younger
brothers watched the operation in silence (she wasn't at home). To this day,
the two younger brothers refer to it as The Rape of Fort Worth.
Another woman I
talked with on the phone later that same day told me her daughter left for
college on the East Coast three weeks ago. So far, she is missing two chairs,
one small bookcase, three saucepans, four blouses and a pair of slacks.
"At least
that's all I've discovered so far," she said. "I haven’t been up in
the attic yet.”
She said she
should have been prepared. When her son left the year before, he not only took
almost everything in his room plus four lawn chairs, he also tried to sneak the
family dog into his car.
She was really
pleased when her son came home so often for weekends (He’s going to school in
Texas). Then she discovered his frequent visits home were because he missed the
dog.
"He said, 'Well,
gee, Mom, I can always talk to you on the phone,” she said. "It keeps things
in perspective for you. I'm not sure I like the perspective, but what are you
going to do?
“One good thing
is that he'll never get homesick. He has most of home in his room.
"When they
come home for Thanksgiving this year, I may have to conduct body searches
before I let them out of the house to go back to school," she said.
Since I know dorm
rooms at my daughter's school are about the size they were when I was in
college, I can’t imagine where she is putting all this stuff. All I can think
of is the scene in Walt Disney's The
Sword in the Stone when Merlin packs the entire contents of his house into
one small carpet bag. He does this by magic, of course, being Merlin. As some
spritely music plays, everything in the house - pots and pans, beds, chairs,
cabinets, chests - marches into the bag, each item getting littler and littler
until it all fits. This is the only possible explanation - magic.
Still, I’m amazed
she was able to get it all in one small car. It was a feat of packing that
would be envied by professionals. There was not one wasted square inch in that car.
She even moved the vase with a dozen red roses that her boyfriend sent her for
her birthday.
Now she
has-announced she's coming home next weekend, too. I would be flattered at all
these visits home except that I know why she's coming.
She can do the
laundry for free here. It costs money at school.
Monday, August 19, 2013
A child becomes a woman -- and I helped
My daughter's birthday is Friday. The other day when I was looking for something else, I came across some columns I wrote about her when I worked for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Here is one published August 22, 1983.
------------------------
My daughter turns 18 tomorrow. We plan to
celebrate by registering her to vote, then going out to lunch and generally
making a fuss over her.
Eighteen. How did that happen? I remember
the nurse putting that serene baby in my arms and my astonishment at her teensy
perfect fingernails and tiny ears. She opened the most piercing blue eyes and
looked right at me.
"Hi baby. I'm your mommy."
She went through college with me, learning
to color in university libraries while I studied, playing with blocks while I
typed papers. Only a couple times did she issue ultimatums. Once, during the
week before finals, she raised herself up to her full 2-year-old height and pushed
all my books off the kitchen table.
"No more books! Me!" she said.
I got the message. We went to the zoo and
played for the rest of the day. The Houston Zoo was free, and we didn't have
much money. We became fast friends with Oscar the Otter and learned to love the
lions.
When I graduated and we moved to Fort Worth
she was not yet 4. When I went to work at the Star-Telegram, l had to find a
way to care for her. At Southcliff Baptist Church's day-care center we found Mrs.
Travis, who made me feel my daughter was in good hands.
At the end of the first day, after worriedly
rushing out to the church, I walked in and she asked, "Are you here already?"
I decided we would both survive this. She stayed there until she was 11.
To those women at the church, I once again
say thank you. The woman my child is, you helped to shape with your loving
care.
The woman my child is...
Well, she's independent. She's smart, but
she has no patience with things that bore her. She does not suffer fools gladly.
She has a temper worthy of her flaming
hair. When she was little, and got angry with me, she would go into her room
and close the door. Pretty soon, little pieces of paper would come sliding out.
"I'm very mad. Don't think you can
come in here."
I'd write back, "Sorry you're mad. Let
me know when you're ready to talk."
After a while, here'd come another
note.
"Do you love me? Check one box."
There would be three boxes drawn on the
paper, one marked "More than anything in the world." Another would
say 'A lot." The third would say "Most of the time."
I'd always check the first box with a big
exclamation mark and slide the paper back into her room. Then she'd come out
and hug me.
She handles her temper somewhat differently
these days. She's more, well, vocal.
She is sentimental, and a true patsy for
animals. She has a genius for line and color, and dresses with flair. She has a
very organized mind and a sense of order, although looking at her room would
cause one to doubt this.
She has a deep rooted sense of fairness. She
still is youthfully unforgiving of people who don't live up to her standards,
but her standards are worth aiming for.
She doesn't yet perceive the world in
shades of gray. With her, issues are
delineated in black and white. It's interesting to listen to her think things
through, though, for she often helps me see something I've missed.
Once she has a sure sense of what she
wants, she doesn’t give up until she gets it. With things that are important to
her, she doesn’t leave anything to chance. She plans and campaigns and lobbies
with all the effectiveness of a Washington veteran.
She's taller than I am, and looks like her
father, though sometimes I see parts of me echoed in her. Sometimes she likes
thinking we are alike. Other times she wants distance and differences between
us.
The years between 13 and 15 were not easy
as she struggled to become her own person. There were days when I wondered if
either one of us would live through that time.
She and I have been through some dark and
scary times together and I'm not ashamed to admit there were days (and nights)
when she propped me up and send back out into the fray.
On the days I come home depressed, she’s
good at reassuring me that the world is worth the effort. When I’m grumpy, she
has a good sense of when to leave me alone and when to jostle me out of the
moodiness.
She still likes a hug now and then and is
not averse to having me baby her from time to time, but then, she occasionally
babies me too these days.
She can detect insincerity at 50 paces. She
has been proven right in her impressions of people so often that I've learned
to listen to her.
She drives me crazy with her messiness and
her total inability to hang clothes up. She makes me want to strangle her with
her whining some times. She irritates me when she tries to manipulate me with
emotionalism and drama.
On the whole, however, l think August. 23, 1965,
at St. Joseph's Hospital in Houston was a day worth celebrating. That serene
baby has grown into a vital, assertive, interesting woman.
Happy birthday, baby.
Do I love you? More than anything in the
whole world!
----------------------------
And I still do, sweetheart. And I have a lot of fun watching your oldest child act EXACTLY like you, especially the lobbying and the drama. Just sayin'.
:)
Sunday, August 18, 2013
Growing up with a friend called Neenie
My daughter's birthday is Friday. The other day when I was looking for something else, I came across some columns I wrote about her when I worked for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Here is one published December 11, 1983.
-------------------------
The little heart
that said "I love you" started it all.
How can one
resist a soft, huggable doll that tells you constantly and faithfully that she
loves you?
That first
Raggedy Ann was given to her before she was born. It sat in a corner of her
crib, smiling and waiting patiently for her arrival. After she came home from
the hospital, it waited some more for her to get old enough to notice.
Raggedy suffered
all the pats and pulls and teething tugs of the growing, exploring baby with
undimmed eyes and complete softness.
When the baby was
old enough to pull up, Raggedy was dragged along. She learned to walk holding Raggedy,
and the doll's soft body even cushioned a tumble or two.
"Raggedy"
was hard to say when she was learning to talk, and it came out
"Neenie." And Neenie she stayed, long after talking was a perfected -
and much used - skill.
Neenie was always
around. She took her everywhere with her, dragging her along by the arm or leg,
tossing her over a shoulder, putting her on a chair beside her at dinner, tucking
her in beside her at night.
The soft round
face got dirty with sticky kisses, and was even once stained with blood when
she cut her forehead in a bad fall and I had to drive her to the doctor. She
held onto Neenie and didn't cry. She was braver than I. But then, I didn't have
a Neenie to hold.
Several times I
had to sew Neenie's arm or a leg back on, and mend tears in her skirt.
New Raggedys appeared
on the scene occasionally, usually at Christmas or birthdays, and they were
much loved, too.
But Neenie was special,
even when her yarn hair began to fall out, an eye came off, her nose wore through,
and one foot tore completely off. (It was sewn back on, held in place with a
plaid fabric that gave Neenie quite a jaunty air.)
The new Raggedys
would be taken places, and would be included in games. One Raggedy was very
big, almost the size of an red-haired 8-year-old. Her father carried it around in the
trunk of his car for weeks before Christmas because there wasn't any other place
big enough to hide it.
On Christmas
morning, she discovered it under the tree and came running to tell me about the
wonderful Raggedy that was just her size. This Raggedy sat on the window seat,
smiling down at the gerbils in their cage, and occasionally cradling her head
when she read a book.
Another was a
handmade Raggedy bought at the Senior Citizens
Fair. It had a
blue dress with lace on the hem, and brown hair, so it wasn't a
"real" Raggedy. But it had that tiny heart.
We even had a
Raggedy Andy, a sprightly little fellow who got pulled around on the back of a bike,
and who rode on our border collie’s back in game after game.
We had Raggedy
Ann and Andy books, and she had some Raggedy Ann and Andy bookends to hold them
in place on her shelves. The Raggedys went on vacations with us, and even
grandparents and uncles treated them with respect.
But Neenie was
always the one. All the others were placed lovingly on the window seat at
night. Neenie slept in the bed.
Neenie was the
one wept upon during those horrible, deeply suffered tragedies of preteen
years. When she was misunderstood, unfairly punished, or just generally mistreated
by her obviously uncaring parents, she would shut herself in her room and tell
Neenie how awful we were.
Neenie listened,
and loved, and smiled.
Her smile was
getting a bit crooked because some of the threads were pulling loose. But it just
added character to her sweet face.
Neenie soaked up
the tears of family changes, and cushioned her head when she flopped on the bed
after that first date, ready to tell about her evening.
Neenie's other
foot came off after being carried by her leg one too many times, causing instant
remorse and hugs.
It got sewn back
on with a patch of red fabric, which, with her plaid patch on the other foot, made
her quite a snazzy lady,
The snazzy lady
Neenie loved and lived with was growing up, and the room was changing around
her. Dolls got packed away and posters went up. Toys were gone, and records
appeared.
A stereo dominates the room. Pillows are
heaped on the bed, and pictures of a special boy are everywhere.
Cats have joined
the family and taken over some of the pillows. Stylish clothes hang in the
closet (and in heaps on the floor. Sigh). Earrings and bracelets and necklaces
and belts fill up spaces on the chest and the bookcases. Senior prom souvenirs
and homecoming mums hang on the walls along with a treasured Outward Bound
banner and certificate.
So much has
changed. So much remains the same.
When that special
boy makes her cry, Neenie still soaks up the tears.
When she's angry or
upset, Neenie still gets hugged. When she's lying on the bed, reading, one hand
almost unconsciously pats Neenie from time to time.
Neenie still
reigns on the bed, smiling.
And the little
heart still says, in slightly faded red, '”I Love You."
------------------------------
And I do too, sweetheart.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




