Thursday, December 20, 2007

Told Ya So

This article by Nicholas Benton headlined “Defectors from Episcopal Church Revert to Ban on Women Priests” was published today in the Falls Church [VA] News Press.

Pardon me if I say, “Told ya so.”

Of course, so did a lot of others folks. It doesn’t take a lot of insight to predict that these guys – and it’s almost completely a white male clergy-led movement – would revert to a patriarchal model that excludes women – and any man deemed unworthy, particularly gay men.

Here’s what Benton wrote about that:
-----------------------------------------------------

Not only does it denounce homosexuality, but it turns out the new, Nigerian-linked association of defectors from the Episcopal Church, U.S.A. also rejects the notion of women in the priesthood, at least for the time being. This is the group that a majority of parishioners at historic The Falls Church voted to align with a year ago.

. . . As for the defectors, the new so-called Convocation of Anglicans in North America (CANA), described as a “mission” of the Anglican Church of Nigeria, held a ceremony in Herndon, Virginia, last week to consecrate four new bishops, all male and two from Nigeria. The ceremony was led by CANA head Rev. Martyn Minns of Fairfax’s Truro Church, another defecting congregation.

In his remarks at the ceremony, Minns said, “At this time, the Church of Nigeria, to which we owe canonical obedience, has no provision for the ordination of women.”

By aligning with the Nigerian church, therefore, CANA repudiated a decision taken by the Episcopal Church, U.S.A. in 1976 to permit the ordination of women.

Minns added, “I am fully aware that this is a topic of concern for many clergy and congregations throughout CANA and one that produces intense reactions.”

He said he’s appointed a task force to study the matter from the standpoint of what he called “two integrities” of the issue, namely, adamant opposition to the ordination of women, on the one hand, and an array of alternatives ranging from some diminished role for women in the leadership of the church to ordination, on the other.

“We will keep our promise to honor both integrities within CANA and fulfill our commitment to the full participation of women in the life and leadership of the church,” he said. “We will do so in such a manner that both those who are unable to support the ordination of women and those who embrace it will know that their position has been honored.”

But Minns did not offer any further clarification on how both opponents and supporters of the ordination of women would come away happy.

This new controversy over the role of women in the church follows on what was the original “cause celebre” that led to a spate of formal defections by a small number of congregations of the Episcopal Church a year ago. That originating cause was anger over the elevation to standing as a bishop of an openly-gay clergyman in 2003.
-------------------------------------------
I keep wondering what all the priests who are women in The Network think about this? Here they have been “good girls” and supported the men in authority and now their allies in CANA tell them they can expect some “diminished role” in leadership but probably not ordination.


Minns says, “We will keep our promise to honor both integrities within CANA and fulfill our commitment to the full participation of women in the life and leadership of the church. We will do so in such a manner that both those who are unable to support the ordination of women and those who embrace it will know that their position has been honored.”


But then there is this statement of his:

“At this time, the Church of Nigeria, to which we owe canonical obedience, has no provision for the ordination of women.”


How is he going to pull this off when the canons of his new province do not allow the ordination of women to the priesthood? How long before he starts selling women the idea that "full participation in the life and leadership of the church" means different roles for women than for men? You know, the old "separate but equal" idea.

All this makes me hope those Episcopalians in the Diocese of Fort Worth know what they signing up for when they “go with” Bishop Iker to the Anglican Province of the Southern Cone – to which they will then “owe canonical obedience.” We know they don't ordain women to the priesthood, but we haven't seen their constitution and canons. One wonders what other things we'll learn.

Meanwhile, back in Falls Church, those who chose to remain with the Episcopal Church are not only thriving, they are also becoming known for their outreach to the poor and hungry.
Benton's article continues:
--------------------------------------------------

Meanwhile, Falls Church’s “Continuing Episcopalians,” those who voted not to defect, now number over 200 in their ranks and worship weekly at a fellowship hall of the Falls Church Presbyterian, across the street from The Falls Church, have grown their ranks and has partnered with Homestretch, Inc., a Falls Church-based non-profit dedicated to transitioning homeless families into stable living environments.


Over Thanksgiving, the “Continuing Episcopalians,” who have adopted the original name of their church, The Falls Church Episcopal Church, worked with Homestretch to prepare and deliver food baskets to a number of Homestretch families. For the Christmas holidays, F.C. Episcopal parishioners spend a day with Homestretch children shopping for and wrapping gifts for their family members. Parish families have committed to supporting six Homestretch families through the Christmas holidays and into the New Year.

Last week, Christopher Fay, executive director of Homestretch, accepted a $1,000 check from Neal M. Callander, junior warden of the F.C. Episcopal.

Robin Gardner, the mayor of the City of Falls Church, has been aligned with this “Continuing Episcopalian” group since last January. “My family and I began attending Falls Church Episcopal when it began meeting in January. The warmth, community and feeling of welcome surrounded us. God’s presence can certainly be felt in this congregation and we are blessed to be a part of this new family,” she wrote in a statement received at the News-Press this week.

“Falls Church Episcopal has become engaged in the larger Falls Church community, as well, and brings their spirit of giving to our City. They are a welcome addition and, as a citizen of Falls Church, I welcome their contributions to help those in and around Falls Church,” she added.

------------------------------------------

One group is narrowing down the list of those who can be in leadership and priestly roles.


The other is reaching out to the poor and hungry.


I know with which group I'd like to be affliated.

9 comments:

Binx said...

Misogny is alive and well and finally out in the open in Virginia.

If they aint preggers and barefoot they are not fulfilling their only God given roll. That and Keeping their heads covered and mouths shut in Church.

Welcome to the Church of Nigeria, as it rushes headlong into the 16th century.

It is one thing to be homophobic it is another to bite off your nose to spite your face.

Father Nelson said...

This is a bunch of hogwash.

Katie, you need to be sure to read +Minns' comments of a few weeks ago, where he assures that there will continue to be both views of WO in CANA.

Katie Sherrod said...

Fr. Nelson,
There are "both views" of women's ordination in the Diocese of Fort Worth, but there are no priests who are women here because Bp. Iker refuses -- with impunity, I might add -- to ordain women to the priesthood. Having "both views" in CANA means nothind when the canons of the province to which "Bishop" Minns owes "canonical obedience" does not allow for the ordination of women to the priesthood.

Ann said...

Well of course there won't be any women clergy - oh maybe some deacons to serve the men - Hope the women who believed Minns "two integrities" are beginning to wake up.

Paul R. said...

Just a slight clarification, Katie. Is the problem that Bishop Iker won't _ordain_ female priests or that he won't _license_ female priests to serve in the Diocese of Fort Worth? If he would do the latter (and not through the "Dallas Plan"), would there really be a problem with his refusal to do the former?

Katie Sherrod said...

Bishop Iker will not ordain women to the priesthood, nor will he license women who have been ordained elsewhere, nor will he license priests who are men who have been ordained by a bishop who is a woman. Women are not "proper matter" for ordination to the priesthood, and therefore cannot be bishops either -- according to Bishop Iker.

johnieb said...

I know which group I AM affiliated with, and it aint represented by Minns, Iker, or any Schismatic, I don't care where he's from (Intentionally exclusive).

God continue to bless your ministry and work.

Binx said...

Women are not proper matter?
Oh i get it no penis, no possible vocation.

I understand the Japanese are into penis worship too.

Weiwen Ng said...

Elizabeth Kaeton remarks that the causes of women and the LGBT community in the church are inextricably intertwined.

that being the case, let's pray for Marty and his colleagues. if they get a foothold for women's ordination in the CoN, they will eventually change.

I know, I'm hopelessly optimistic.